Monday, 6 February 2012

Media in the 21st Century – The Internet

Whilst it is easiest to look at the internet from a technological determinist perspective, it can quite readily be seen from a ‘Whig’ (or Liberal) or Market perspective.
Using a technological determinist approach, the internet was invented in the 1970s and was initially used as a way for scientists to share resources and data. As the internet developed, people began to use it for subcultural proto-commercial purposes and, by the late 1980s, people had begun to use it as a research tool as well, giving way to increasing commercial use. Then, by the mid-90s it had developed to allow companies to sell directly to us and advertise on most sites as well as be used for cultural and civil discourse, though this is far less prominent.

Alternatively, you could suggest that the internet was developed to suit the needs of society to be able to communicate instantly with one another and research things quickly and easily. I could also be argued that the internet developed more and more commercially due to the amount of money invested into it both by companies trying to use the internet to expand their business and by those manufacturing the equipment to use it.

Since then, there have been many attempts to try and control the internet’s content by both government and companies but, generally, these plans fall through due to public protests that the internet is meant to be a place for free expression and a gathering of the world’s accumulated knowledge.

Saturday, 4 February 2012

Media in the 21st Century – Music, Profitability and Piracy

With the invention of new technologies, the music industry has had to (and continues to) adapt to ensure that it continues to be profitable and does not lose out to music piracy.

Man of the technological advancements over the past 30 or so years can be seen as the industry attempting to ‘get around’ piracy (depending, of course, from what perspective you look at it from).  When people were able to record music off the radio onto cassettes, CDs came out. Then, when you could burn your own CDs, downloadable music came around. Now, when music can be downloaded illegally, it’s fashionable to buy vinyl records though most people don’t – because they’re both ‘vintage’ and stylish they’re incredibly expensive.

Of course, you could argue that people in the music industry could offer their music for free, like it is on spotify and other sites, and make money through advertising, merchandising and gigs. In many respects, this creates a sort of historical loop as, in the past, you could not listen to music at home and had to pay to watch performances which was the only way in which musicians made money.

However, what the industry tends to worry about is that in doing this, no-one would buy CDs or other music platforms anymore. Saying this, they have been continually predicting that these platforms would die out over the years in much the same way people have been predicting the end of the world – with no evidence or success.
For now, at least, the music industry continues to triumph (generally speaking) over piracy with a multitude of different platforms.
What do you think? Do you prefer downloads or owning physical copies of your music? Leave a comment.

Practical Radio

Over the past two sessions, we have been gathering and editing audio for radio news and, so far, I’m loving it! Partially because I feel like I’m doing really well and understand it but mostly because I find it both interesting and fun. What I didn’t find fun was talking to actual members of the public… 
Let me start at the beginning. After our session on different types of radio news, we were asked to come up with a question and record the answers given to us by ‘the man on the street’… which would’ve been fine if I didn’t hate talking to people I don’t know. Stick me in a room with friends or in front of my own video camera and I can talk for England but ask me to talk to a stranger, whether individually, to a crowd or over the radio or television and you’ve got no chance (though, thinking about it, I read the news on the radio a couple of times before Christmas, so… slight exaggeration)
Before that though, we had to set up the Marantz. People that have only used the pocket tracks seem to be of the opinion that these are big, scary and complicated – they’re really not. All you have to do is put the microphone in the socket saying mono, the headphones in the bit that says headphones and you’re pretty much ready to rock (though you want to check it’s recording in the right format and it’s not set to internal mic). Saying this, we got out, turned it on and decided it didn’t have battery – in the future we’ll remember to check before we leave, though it was a brilliant excuse for a coffee break.
So, once that was sorted and I’d conned Emma into doing the talking, we set off to ask the world, only to be rejected by it. Like, completely. Which is when she decided it was my turn…
We got back with 4 really good responses and, before the next lecture, I got bored and downloaded some free audio editing software to have a go. Apparently, I’m quite good at it. I think this is largely due to my previous editing experience from a-level media and video club (video club = youth group who filmed things and had better equipment than the local TV station place). Anyway, by the time we got to the lecture, I already knew what bits of audio I wanted and roughly how to use the software so creating the voxpops was fairly straightforward. We then recorded a short piece to introduce them, voiced by Emma (because if I had to ask strangers, she had to introduce it – it’s only fair).
How to use the radio booths:
1.       Turn on mixer & mic
2.       Turn the 2 grey master faders on the right all the way up
3.       Ensure mic is plugged in (should be in the far left, the fader below controls it)
4.       Turn on laptop & open Adobe Audition
5.       Record by pressing red record button on transport controls. Select 44100 stereo, 16 bit
6.       Ensure speaker is off/muted to stop feed back
7.       To play back, stop recording, switch mic off and speaker on & press play
For next week, we’re finding instrumental music to use as a bed (I would assume that’s what it’s for anyway).
I got bored and had a go home here…


(Bed: Daedelus - Make It Drums. Licenced under a creative commons attribution licence. Link to FMA site: http://freemusicarchive.org/music/Daedelus/Bonus_Beat_Blast_2011/15_daedelus-make_it_drums)
We also learnt about techniques for a good radio interview. It is essentially dependant on having good questions and the ability to operate the equipment well.
Equipment:
·         Ensure it works before using it (ahem…)
·         Hold microphone firmly and keep steady to avoid mic rattle
·         Keep recording; pausing it won’t lessen your editing at all and you may miss something interesting or important
Questions:
·         Try to make it sound and flow like an unscripted chat
·         Listen to answers given and adapt around them
·         Research your interviewee and subject first
·         Avoid closed questions
·         Encourage interviewee to continue by looking interested and nodding (even if it makes you look a bit stupid)
That’s it so far; looking forward to learning more next week.

Friday, 3 February 2012

Media in the 21st Century - Popular Music History

Due to the problematic nature of proving firsts, it is better to look at popular music history as a series of events without using specific dates.

Modern music revolutions tend to follow the same sort of pattern:

·         1920’s – Jazz – originally mistrusted, seen as dangerous, associated with drugs & miscegenation

·         1950’s – Elvis & Rock ‘n’ Roll – morally suspect, thought to sexualise young women

·         1960’s – Dylan ‘goes electric’ – seen as a betrayal of culture and politics – also a technological revolution

·         1970’s – Punk – created fear over moral values, seen as untalented

Nowadays these styles are seen as significant steps forwards in music and are often praised and therefore have cultural worth (often leading to increased prices on related items – ‘vintage’).

This sort of pattern can also be seen in technological revolutions; the use of amplification in music can be debated as either de-skilling or democratising the ability to play instruments such as the guitar in the same way that auto-tune has with singing.

This shows that histories are constructed narratives which can be made to fit the views of an audience to provide evidence for a certain point of view.

Romanticism, Realism and Revolution

In 1698, there was a point where instead of the British Empire, we had the Scottish Empire instead. At a cost of 1/5 of their total wealth, Scots went across the ocean to set up a colony called “New Caledonia” with disastrous consequences – the area was a malarial swamp and many of its inhabitants died. Scotland became essentially bankrupt, making it easy for England to bribe them into signing the Act of Union in 1707.

1746 saw the Jacobite rebellion, ending in the defect of Prince Charles Stuart at Culloden which ultimately established the United Kingdom.

Ireland signed their Act of Union in 1801.

1799 - The government created income tax as a “temporary measure” to pay for the expensive Napoleonic War

In around 1805, British naval power is absolute and blockades French ports, allowing British exports to boom. With Europe at war, Britain is able to build its empire without resistance and creates a monopoly trade with South America – unfortunately this results in the enslavement of millions of Africans in the Transatlantic Triangular Trade.

The end of the war resulted in the end of Britain’s boom and the beginning of widespread unemployment and a dramatic fall in wages. This led to the Corn Laws which were enforced between 1815 and 1846. These laws imposed a tariff on imported grains in an attempt to make British grown produce both profitable and the most affordable to buy and save the British Farming Industry. Industrialists of the time were against the Corn Laws as it meant they had to keep wages higher in order for their workers to be able to afford bread to eat; by repealing the laws, they would be able to pay them far less for the same amount of work as they would still be able to feed themselves.

The ending of the Corn Laws in conjunction with the Enclosures Act forced farmers to move to the cities to make room for more efficient, industrialised farming. For the factory owners at this time, this allowed them to make wages incredibly low due to the affordability of bread and the amount of competition to secure employment but the towns and cities were dire slums and had little or no political representation in Parliament. This created pressure for political reform and after an initially fairly brutal political reaction, the government created the 1832 Reform Act.

The 1834 Poor Laws led to the creation of workhouses which were on the utilitarian belief that people aim to live with as much pleasure and little pain as possible. The solution to unemployment needed to be worse than being employed in the factories as otherwise no-one would work due to the awful conditions.

William Cobbett was a Romantic. Romanticism formed a new moral system based on manners, aesthetic motive and the importance of taste. It rejected the Enlightenment and supported organised religion and nationalism. It also led to anti-Semitism; in rejecting the Enlightenment, they also rejected the religious tolerance that came with it. This was further fuelled by pseudo-scientific theories of race and racial inferiority of the time. This is seen in Cobbett’s rural rides when he writes:

“I could not help calculating how long it might be before some Jew would begin to fix his eye upon Highclere, and talk of putting out the present owner.”

Romanticism in England was, essentially, paused during the Napoleonic War for some reason that I personally cannot quite understand. However, this made way for the industrial revolution which romantics were against as it destroyed the beauty of towns and the countryside. After the war finished, Romanticism began to be popular again.

Cobbett set out to ‘tour’ the countryside and document the effects of the Industrial Revolution on farmers in his book titled “Rural Rides”. This is an empirical way of gathering information as it is derived from sensory data and experience rather than thought and logic.

Realism also becomes popular in light of the Industrial Revolution; Charles Dickens in his novels depicts ordinary people in ordinary settings in a way that is both frank and honest and was inspired by the squalor, neglect and abandonment he saw around him. In this respect, it could also be argued that Cobbett is also a realist.

Public Affairs - Councils

First of all, contrary to my belief, MP’s don’t control the council. Neither do they have any control over the courts, though I didn’t think they did. All MPs do is represent their constituency in Parliament. That's literally it. Well, perhaps not quite literally, but if you had to give the job a four word description “represent constituency in Parliament” would be it.

The council (and therefore not the MPs) control the budget for the area and have all the power. It also has a hierarchy; from most powerful to least, it goes:

County Council
District Council
Parish Council/Town Forum

Large cities, however, often have a Unitary Authority which, essentially, is all of these merged into one.
This table demonstrates the differences in power for local councils:
Hampshire County Council (HCC)
Winchester City Council (WCC)
Turnover £1.8 billion
Turnover £12.5 million
Responsible for: 500,000 homes, Education (170,000 pupils and 10,000 teachers), 53 libraries, 8 County Parks
Bins, leisure, parking, environmental health.

Councillors, much like MPs, are voted for. The area that votes for them is called a ward (for MPs it’s a constituency).
When reporting on Council meetings, you do have qualified privilege but it is subject to explanation or contradiction. This means that you must ask people involved for their stance and give them the opportunity to deny any allegations made against them. This must be included in your story.

WINOL Review

It seems that over the holidays WINOL has undergone a bit of a face lift. Whilst this, in many respects, is nice to see in an ever evolving world of media, I can’t help but feel that many of the elements are strange or unnecessary, particularly the “voice of God” at the beginning of the show; for a British audience, which this programme is aimed at, this is particularly unusual and, in my opinion, off-putting. In fact, it made me laugh. I’m not sure if this is because I found it so peculiar or because it sent me into a micro-rage at how everything nowadays is becoming “Americanised” (which is, in itself, an Americanisation – they’re becoming almost impossible to avoid).

However, on the whole it’s still very good, particularly as a student news programme. Of course, there are a few areas for improvement; some of the presenters talk much too fast still and, on occasion, look far too casual in the posture or positioning in front of the camera and there are also a couple of really slight issues with some of the lighting and sound, but perhaps I’m just over scrutinising it.

I also am still having problems with the length of time given to sport. It may be, in part at least, due to the fact that I don’t have any personal interest in it, but I can’t help but think that the amount of coverage given to one individual game of football is a little ridiculous. For example the coverage of the Eastleigh game this week lasted one minute and 28 seconds which doesn’t sound a lot but considering the whole sports section is four minutes 21 long and the entire bulletin is just over 15 minutes, you can start to see what I’m talking about. The same thing goes for coverage of the ice hockey. This is not to say that these aren’t well done, they just feel like they drag on a little. I think this may be largely due to the amount of detail and large gaps between sentences filled with clips that don’t feel overly relevant. The coverage of the Winchester City game I think is done much better; it’s short and to the point, giving enough detail to know what has happened without going into so much that it seems to go on forever…

Perhaps I’m biased with my major dislike for sport (particularly football).

Watch this week’s WINOL bulletin here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fo0Xbie48wo